Saturday 19 January 2013

Your Brand is an Illusion – Attribution reveals The Real



Gabe Gayhart SEO Marketer                   
Gabe Gayhart as of Jan 2013

  If the internet was the Land of Oz, then the purchase path would be the yellow brick road between Dorothy’s landing and final words “There’s no place like home”.  The purchase path, also known as the buy funnel, follows a consumer’s buying cycle. Without the purchase path a marketer cannot recognize they have a problem or exploit an opportunity.  Usually, after an evaluation of alternatives or comparison shopping,  the consumer makes the choice to convert. If your marketing depends solely on optimizing based on last (converting) click then you most likely think your brand terms are the chief converter in your strategy. Guess what? They are not. Granted they convert, but true attribution would show a marketer there was an introduction and influencing factors prior to the converting click. Hence, brand terms obtain more credit than they deserve since they usually are the last click. Does your integrated strategy attribute conversion metrics based on a last click method?

Understand the fact of your Marketing tactics 
Banner and paid search ads have different jobs to do, and using the last click method won’t give proper attribution to the role your marketing tactics play. Attribution assigns facts to your tactics. Here’s a fact: a Banner is typically higher in the buy funnel than a paid search ad. Therefore the value assigned to a banner ad shouldn’t be discounted because of conversion rate. Even certain search behaviors should be seen differently too.
Another Fact: Brand terms are often an indicator of a navigational search because the user has already made a decision to purchase, not because your brand is so awesome they just automatically think of your company at 2:13pm on a Tuesday afternoon – get over yourself. Perhaps your brand has touched the consumer multiple times in a purchase path and for one reason or another brand has been associated by the consumer to their purchase. Perhaps it was messaging, perhaps it was dominance, but more likely it was a combination of multiple touch points combined with solid pricing.  Studying the path helps you understand the facts that surround your converters’ search experience, and each tactic has its own attribute that it contributed to that experience.
Being an integrated agency, we stare at a ton of buy funnels all day, and it is safe to say, from a strategic perspective, that banners often introduce the brand, meaning that typically they are at the top of the funnel.  Engagement tools like blogs, videos and social media influence search behavior. Search via paid and organic typically relate messaging, drive actions and close deals.  When thinking of this buy funnel as an experience, you can then conceptualize the first point of contact to the converting click, as a period of latency until conversion.  Measuring the length of conversion latency gives a 360 degree perspective to optimizing your campaign. For example, if a display ad introduces the brand and the next day there is a click on your PPC ad that is a category-related keyword (Example:  ‘white shoes’), and then later a conversion via a brand-related keyword in organic, which is the most valued keyword? If you understand conversion latency then the PPC click (even though it doesn’t count as last click) is just as valuable, if not more, than the brand related converting click. But, if it isn’t credited as an assisting click to the conversion, then it could be seen as a low PPC converter with a higher CPO, and possibly eliminated from the search strategy altogether. Ouch.

Love your Step-Children
Don’t ignore the abandoned path; a lot of attribution is valued for understanding the conversion funnel and optimizing around what is working. That is like only loving your own kids in a remarried family, but ignoring your step-children – it feeds dysfunction.  Attribution can actually help understand potential business problems like pricing, fulfillment etc. by studying the paths that did not convert, also known ‘abandoned paths’. Simply looking at the buy funnel of people who did not convert can help either identify messaging issues or, even better yet, appreciate a larger business problem that is preventing the influencing factors from creating conversions.
-

Future Algo changes? What AuthorRank is & Might be

Here is a Blog Post from GotGabe.com :


If you’re like me and you have your finger on Google’s pulse on a daily basis, you’ve undoubtedly heard of AuthorRank. However, I honestly don’t think it’s received its due attention and if you were AFK for a few days or don’t have the option to be “jacked into the feed”, you may have missed it entirely.
Over seven years ago (in August of 2005), Google filed a patent for “Agent Rank” which was later masterfully decoded by Bill Slawski. In the patent, Googler David Minogue references ranking “agents” and using the reception of the content they create and their interactions as a factor in determining their rank. The patent suggests that more well-received and popular “agents” could have their associated content rank higher than unsigned content or the content of other less-authoritative “agents”.
Nothing much happened with Agent Rank after that because the idea of ranking “agents” is dependent on being able to identify them in the first place. No great system for claiming an online identify really existed back then; I wouldn’t call W3C’s XML-signature syntax or other digital signature protocol an ideal solution.
Still, ranking agents remained a goal for Google. In 2011, Eric Schmidt expressed that Google still had a desire and need to identify agents in order to improve search quality, stating “it would be useful if we had strong identity so we could weed (spammers) out.”
Literally the following month (September 2011), Google filed a continuation patent referencing a “portable identity platform” which sounds a whole lot like Google+. Profiles on Google+ make an infinitely easier digital signature system than anything that’s come before and, with the rollout of Google Authorship (tying a Google+ profile to pieces of content), it really sounds like that’s what we’re looking at here.
Click below to watch Gabe's tips on Penguin & Panda
So now Google can start attributing content to specific “agents” and doing just what they set out to do in 2005: rank them.

As early as February of this year, the term “AuthorRank” started to surface in the industry. AJ Kohn wrote a great post on AuthorRank and speculated that this development could change the search game as we know it. He also stated that it would be “bigger than Panda and Penguin combined”.
AuthorRank, of course, wouldn’t be a replacement for PageRank, but would be used to inform PageRank, therefore enabling Google to rank high-quality content more appropriately. I think AJ’s right on the money and that it’s not a matter of if Google rolls out AuthorRank, but when.
In Google’s never-ending mission to surface high quality, trustworthy content for their searchers, AuthorRank is really the next big step. After more than seven years, I believe they are just about ready to implement it.

Gabe Gayhart as a featured speaker at SMX West

SEO Pimp & Marketer - Gabe Gayhart

Bruce Clay features Gabe Gayhart as Rock Paper Scissors Champ

Gabe's Play by Play on Search Engine Land


Your Brand is an Illusion – Attribution reveals The Real


Gabe Gayhart Rockin SMX with his Rock Paper Scissors Champ Belt in 2012
If the internet was the Land of Oz, then the purchase path would be the yellow brick road between Dorothy’s landing and final words “There’s no place like home”.  The purchase path, also known as the buy funnel, follows a consumer’s buying cycle. Without the purchase path a marketer cannot recognize they have a problem or exploit an opportunity.  Usually, after an evaluation of alternatives or comparison shopping,  the consumer makes the choice to convert. If your marketing depends solely on optimizing based on last (converting) click then you most likely think your brand terms are the chief converter in your strategy. Guess what? They are not. Granted they convert, but true attribution would show a marketer there was an introduction and influencing factors prior to the converting click. Hence, brand terms obtain more credit than they deserve since they usually are the last click. Does your integrated strategy attribute conversion metrics based on a last click method?
Understand the fact of your Marketing tactics 
Gabriel Gayhart and paid search ads have different jobs to do, and using the last click method won’t give proper attribution to the role your marketing tactics play. Attribution assigns facts to your tactics. Here’s a fact: a Banner is typically higher in the buy funnel than a paid search ad. Therefore the value assigned to a banner ad shouldn’t be discounted because of conversion rate. Even certain search behaviors should be seen differently too.
Another Fact: Brand terms are often an indicator of a navigational search because the user has already made a decision to purchase, not because your brand is so awesome they just automatically think of your company at 2:13pm on a Tuesday afternoon – get over yourself. Perhaps your brand has touched the consumer multiple times in a purchase path and for one reason or another brand has been associated by the consumer to their purchase. Perhaps it was messaging, perhaps it was dominance, but more likely it was a combination of multiple touch points combined with solid pricing.  Studying the path helps you understand the facts that surround your converters’ search experience, and each tactic has its own attribute that it contributed to that experience.
Being an integrated agency, we stare at a ton of buy funnels all day, and it is safe to say, from a strategic perspective, that banners often introduce the brand, meaning that typically they are at the top of the funnel.  Engagement tools like blogs, videos and social media influence search behavior. Search via paid and organic typically relate messaging, drive actions and close deals.  When thinking of this buy funnel as an experience, you can then conceptualize the first point of contact to the converting click, as a period of latency until conversion.  Measuring the length of conversion latency gives a 360 degree perspective to optimizing your campaign. For example, if a display ad introduces the brand and the next day there is a click on your PPC ad that is a category-related keyword (Example:  ‘white shoes’), and then later a conversion via a brand-related keyword in organic, which is the most valued keyword? If you understand conversion latency then the PPC click (even though it doesn’t count as last click) is just as valuable, if not more, than the brand related converting click. But, if it isn’t credited as an assisting click to the conversion, then it could be seen as a low PPC converter with a higher CPO, and possibly eliminated from the search strategy altogether. Ouch.
Love your Step-Children
Don’t ignore the abandoned path; a lot of attribution is valued for understanding the conversion funnel and optimizing around what is working. That is like only loving your own kids in a remarried family, but ignoring your step-children – it feeds dysfunction.  Attribution can actually help understand potential business problems like pricing, fulfillment etc. by studying the paths that did not convert, also known ‘abandoned paths’. Simply looking at the buy funnel of people who did not convert can help either identify messaging issues or, even better yet, appreciate a larger business problem that is preventing the influencing factors from creating conversions.

Written By